Wickersham's Conscience

Commentary, Reviews and Nature Photography

Republican Cautionary Tales: You Can’t Make This Stuff Up

Ex-Congressman Bob Ney (R., Ohio) has a new book out in which he calls House Speaker John Beohner “a bit lazy” and “a man who was all about winning and money. He was a chain-smoking, relentless wine drinker who was more interested in the high life–golf, women, cigarettes, fun, and alcohol.” Keep in mind that Ney pled to felonies out of the Abramoff scandal, so you have to consider the source. Still, his description of the deal he claims to have cut with Boehner sounds absolutely true to type.

Then there’s Washington State Rep. Ed Orcutt (R), the ranking Republican member of the state House Transportation Committee, who thinks that bicyclists produce more carbon dioxide than automobiles do. Er… No. The European Cyclists Federation puts CO2 emissions from biking at about 10 times less than driving a car (PDF), even after accounting for the emissions required to make the bike and emissions linked to grow, package and ship the food the rider eats to power the bicycle. Plainly, Rep. Orcutt wasn’t selected for his ability to think logically.

A week after the State of South Carolina argued in the U.S. Supreme Court that any need  for the Voting Rights Act had long since passed in the modern South, a black, openly gay mayoral candidate in Clarksdale, Mississippi was murdered, beaten, dragged and burned and possibly dragged behind an automobile to a horrible, excruciating death. There has been an arrest, and the suspect is black, but still. Modest props to U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson (R., Mississippi) for asking the FBI to get involved.

At the 2011 Women’s World Cup, North Korea’s soccer team claimed that positive doping tests resulted from musk deer gland therapy used to treat players who had been struck by lightning. The explanation was not as convincing as it was inventive, and North Korea was banned from the next World Cup. But it’s slightly more credible than your average Republican politician.

About these ads

Written by Wickersham's Conscience

March 7, 2013 at 6:15 am

Posted in Commentary, Hypocrisy

Tagged with ,

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Rand Paul’s performance yesterday was just classic.

    Kate McLaughlin

    March 7, 2013 at 9:33 am

    • Yes. Rand Paul doing Jimmy Stewart. Street theater for neocons.

      /WC

      Wickersham's Conscience

      March 7, 2013 at 9:51 am

    • Exactly. Rand Paul is preparing for a run for president in 2016, so he has to raise his political profile, and the way to do that is to waste our tax money trying to convince the gullible and ill-informed that he’s something he is not–a competent politician. IMO, Rand Paul is as interested in drones being used against Americans as reindeer are that Santa Claus will hook them up to his sleigh to deliver Christmas presents to kids around the world on December 25. He might be somewhat concerned, but I don’t believe he’s as concerned as he’s trying so hard to make us believe he is. I’ve always gotten the vibe from him that if it doesn’t affect him or his family, it’s just not that important.

      majiir

      March 7, 2013 at 4:10 pm

  2. Sen Paul scored no points with neocons by his filibuster. I just watched part of today’s senate proceedings in which two of the chief neocons, Sen McCain and Sen Lindsey Graham, condemned Sen Paul. McCain said that the Qn he posed and insisted on an answer was “ludicrous”, among other choice adjectives to describe Paul’s conduct. Graham said that the Qn “didn’t deserve an answer” because it was outlandish and ludicrous. Graham commented several times how he was in agreement with the Pres about his conduct of drone program and differed in that he would be less rigorous than he says the president is in his decisions to use drones. I cannot foresee any circumstances in which neocons would tolerate Sen Paul in a national leadership position. Graham “praised” Sen Paul in an instance of another senate vote 90-1 for standing all by his lonesome in a vote relating to Iran nuclear weaponization that took place some time ago, maybe last year. His “praise” was quite obviously condemnation and contempt. There is no way that three years passage of time by 2016 or the primary season is going to smooth over the differences between Sen Paul’s libertarianism and the fervor of neocons for war. Paul was pulling an isolated stunt and he got a few colleagues to go along with encouragement. I’ve heard others on the Right whose view of Paul was along the lines of McCain and Graham, that it was a stunt that was misguided and unhelpful and a waste of time.
    Paul Eaglin
    Fairbanks

    paul2eaglin

    March 7, 2013 at 9:34 pm

  3. As I listened to McCain and Graham pillory Sen. Paul, I couldn’t help be reminded of the effort by those two senators in attacking Amb. Susan Rice regarding her reporting of the Benghazi incident in a TV interview. She merely related admin talking points as a substitute for an admin official who was unable at the time to address the specifics of that incident, and who was supposed to do so instead of her. Those two held her personally responsible even though she had nothing to do with it. They went so far as to condemn Amb. Rice as “not very smart.” This was a bit much to hear from someone like McCain who has boasted with enormous pride that he finished fifth from the bottom of his Naval Academy class academically. In contrast, the “not very smart” Amb. Rice was Phi Beta Kappa at Stanford Univ., a Rhodes Scholar whose graduate school dissertation was highly regarded. Neither McCain nor Graham has retreated from McCain’s continued assertion that Gov. Palin was qualified and fit to be vice president of the USA. Their heartburn with Sen. Paul is that he and his father are consistent that the USA should withdraw militarily from its extensive imperial presence around the world. They can’t tolerate the thought of a reduced military along the lines of what the two Pauls have in contemplation. Their contempt along those lines came through loud and clear as they criticized him. Sen. Paul doesn’t stand a chance in the national GOP, given the control of the neocons and the penchant for military exploits as the solution to any difficulty.
    Paul Eaglin
    Fairbanks

    paul2eaglin

    March 8, 2013 at 4:19 pm


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: